| Part 8
– The Unintended Consequences
There are certain groups of people to whom the
consequences I am about to describe are truly intended. Communists,
fascists, socialists, monarchists, and folks who just plain hate the United
States will find these things to be understandable and welcome results of
Invasive Species proposals.
The Federalization and reduction of state authorities for Invasive
Species is exactly like the Federalization of Endangered Species, the
Federalization of Marine Mammals (those not in international or Federal
offshore waters), and the Federalization of Animal Welfare. In each of
theses areas, after the initial media blitz of propaganda tales,
Federalization through new Federal laws resulted. No one was believed who
said these things would lead to problems. Those laws passed quicker than
Mexican chili through a Norwegian and we all know the results. Invasive
Species will be no different.
Today the Federal government claims exclusive jurisdiction over any
plant or animal group it names as Endangered or Threatened under the
auspices of the Endangered Species Act. Today the Federal government
regulates dog breeding, circus animals, farmers who raise animals, animal
experimenters, "exotic" animal enclosures, research techniques
and standards and many other animal uses under the Animal Welfare Act.
Today the Federal government maintains a tight lid on any marine mammal
management including total protection from any renewable uses under the
auspices of the Marine Mammal Protection Act. These increases in Federal
jurisdictions and the concomitant reduction of state jurisdictions affect
each of us in our everyday lives.
The US Constitution established a government without a King or a Supreme
Parliament. The Founding Fathers knew from firsthand experience and from
ample lessons throughout history that any strong central power was
eventually abused to the detriment of citizens. So in their real wisdom
they established a central (Federal) government that was divided into three
co-equal branches. They further limited the Federal government to the
important and essential responsibilities of defense, foreign relations, and
interstate commerce. They then placed all other governmental
responsibilities at the state level. The state level is closer to the
people and therefore more responsive and accountable. Day to day things
like animal welfare, animal management and use, and maintaining the sort of
wild environment desired by the residents of each state is not and should
not be a Federal responsibility. Even Federal lands within a state should
be managed in cooperation with the state except where an over-riding
Federal interest or other landowner interest dictates otherwise. As all of
us (citizens, states, interest groups, bureaucrats, businessmen, and
politicians) acquiesce in the growth of this trend we steadily change our
form of government to where the Chinese, North Koreans, and many Moslem
countries are today. That is a government system where all property and all
day-to-day activities are controlled and dictated by an unaccountable
Federal or central government. Not unaccountable you say? Do you think the
current battle over Federal judge appointments portends anything but the
appointment of Federal judges who heel to powerful politicians or certain
ideologies? Do you not think that if an "urban" President or a
socialist President gets elected it will be any harder to seize the reins
of power than Hitler did from the German Reichstag (Parliament)? When all
the power is in one place, the guy who controls that place controls the
power. If this trend continues the future is too awful to contemplate.
While environmental groups, animal rights groups, and many urban supporters
of rural "clearances" for wildlife and wild areas (i.e.
Wildlands) know that what they are doing by Federalizing everything is the
only way to achieve their goals, they too will surely see the sad result
come home to roost on them eventually. The loss of state authorities and
the growth of an unaccountable central power only creates a habitat for a
rat and when you do that you can be sure of one thing, a rat will come. We
must all understand what this Federalizing of every human whim leads to,
before it is too late.
Unnoticed too will be an eventual additional justification for even more
annual land purchasing by the Federal government and by state governments
using Federal money as the Invasive Species program matures. State land
acquisitions using Federal funds may as well be Federal lands because when
you use Federal funds you are answerable to all current and futures Federal
whims as many states have discovered. Environmentalists will discover that
they can justify stopping all grazing or logging in this valley or on these
soils because exotic species X seeds are present in the soil or how certain
private properties "infect" Federal properties. Stopping uses
will diminish profitability and eventually make the properties ripe for The
Nature Conservancy or any of a half dozen Federal agencies to buy it out
"for the environment".
Land Uses over greater and greater areas will come under Federal control
as cheatgrass or purple loosestrife are alleged to be "spread" by
discing or grazing.
Transportation of animals and plants will likewise be steadily
constricted by Federal regulations as open transportation or swine in
trucks or dog kennels are claimed as vectors for (fill in the blank).
All of these lesser-unintended consequences are of little import though
eventually. Whenever that point is reached where states realize and accept
an "inferior" role in our government vis a viz the Federal
government the situation for us will be similar to when England controlled
Ireland 100 years ago or like China controls Tibet today. State governments
are becoming more and more like interest group clients of Federal largesse
and less and less like powerful units of government with specific roles and
responsibilities. An all-powerful central government that accumulates all
that power for "good" reasons will behave just like George III or
Kim Jong Il. That is to say in it’s own interest to the detriment of
everyone else.
This is why the reform of these other statutes is so important. This is
why it is very important to work to reduce the Federal government in these
areas of growth. This is why squarely facing reducing budgets, reducing
personnel, and reducing authorities at the Federal level is more important
today that ever before.
The next Part (9) will end this series and will suggest What (I believe)
Must Be Done. I thank those of you who have read these articles and I hope
this final one, even though it is tougher to suggest sound ideas than to
condemn past ones or explain recent history, is worthwhile and useful to
you. |