| G.
K. Chesterton wisely observed early in the last century that art is joined to
and an expression of life and human society. Our environment and all of its
elements and effects are like art. This natural fact transcends all of the
propaganda and "science" that asserts there is only one
"right" or "proper" or "correct" or
"best" environment. Whether we call it a "Native" or
"Pre-Columbian" or "Wilderness" or "Wildlands"
or "Protected" Ecosystem or Environment, it is a figment of the
values of a segment of our society at this point in time.
What is the "native ecosystem" of
central Africa? Is it the forests grazed and trampled to destruction by
overpopulations of elephants? Is it the bush around villages or towns that
have been in place for eons? Is it the imagined plant and animal mix before
Arab slave traders or conquerors from far off massacred and enslaved
"native" populations? What about our UN "partners" in
forcing Asians and South Americans to "preserve" "their native
ecosystems?" Is Germanys' "native ecosystem" dated before the
Nazis? Before the Romans? Before the Cro-Magnons? Is England's "native
ecosystem" dated before the Battle of Hastings? Before the Roman
occupation? Before the druids? Why are any of these dates or any particular
mix of plants and animals worthy of note?
The answer lies in the perfectly sound
biological interest in determining what plants and animals came, survived and
disappeared over time in a particular area. It is useful to understand how and
why our environment changes both naturally and as a result of human
activities. Aside from the pursuit of knowledge for knowledge's sake, our
ability to predict the impact of our actions and to understand the
environmental changes around us is one of many such human abilities that
distinguish us from all life around us. Our cities and suburbs and rural
areas, indeed our oceans and unpopulated corners of the earth are and will
continue to reflect our "life and human society."
Plants and animals have been invading new
(and often for some of them, old) habitats since time began. Plants and
animals have been disappearing from habitats for almost as long. Weather,
rainfall, snowfall, fire, predators, elimination of a food source, opportunity
in the form of a floating log or a windstorm, and other reasons too long to
mention account for these changes. In recent (geologically) times, human
activities such as farming, hunting, migration, villages, ships, trade, roads,
fire, domestications, and another list too long to mention introduced and
diminished untold plant and animal communities. North America's environmental
changes over the past 20,000 years are spectacular and some of the most
extreme known, because when the prodigious changes of the past 500 years
occurred, advanced European science and record-keeping ably recorded the
changes.
Until recently we used this knowledge to
construct productive domestic areas around settlements and to use wild areas
as best we could. As mistakes were made, we learned. Today there is no
inconsistency or conflict between energy development or plant and animal use
and preserving the richest environment both biologically and regards human
societies. All that is needed is thoughtful and continuous application of what
we know and have yet to learn. Running from this is like the parable in the
New Testament where one of the servants took the masters money and buried it
to "preserve" it. |