Page 1  |  Page 2     Page 3     Page 4 

IWMC - World Conservation Trust

SEARCH

IWMC HOME
BOOKSTORE
eNEWSLETTER
IWMC FORUM
James Beers
Endangered Species
MEDIA CENTER
SUSTAINABLE USE

ELEPHANTS
FISH
MAMMALS
REPTILES
SEALS
SEA TURTLES
SHARKS
WHALES

ABOUT IWMC

CENSORED

CONTACT IWMC

EVENTS CALENDAR
WEB LINKS

 
 
Oh, I almost forgot. The radicals and the Federal bureaucrats have begun to "worry" that domestic sheep grazing in the Sierras will "infect" the precious California bighorn sheep. So the Federal government is using the bighorn as the reason they "have" to shut down the sheep grazing allotments all over the Sierras. If this stands (as it has) what about domestic dogs transmitting parvo or distemper to the precious wolves? Dog owners (like every other animal user group) continue to look inward and argue among themselves about shelters and rescue and some old lady found with a bunch of dogs and the need for "more" laws while such precedents are established and expanded. I was told once as a kid in Illinois that when hogs were butchered "they use everything but the squeal". Well those hogs' utility had nothing on these California bighorns. I wouldn't be surprised if in the next 5 years they are the reason Californians shut down fast food joints, outlaw SUV's, and sign the Kyoto Treaty on their own.

STATUS OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT:
In February of 2005 the status of the Endangered Species Act is problematic at best. The Act has become a tool to implement the nightmares of radical organizations and the dreams of federal bureaucrats. The previous President grew the Act dramatically and hired activists throughout government to expand the Federal authority for Federal benefit. State government authority and private property owners have been greatly diminished. Citizens in practically every walk of life (except bureaucrats, environmental extremists, and animal rights radicals) are being hurt. The disruption of the natural environment of the United States is extreme and damaging to plants and animals and their habitats.

The current President is more benign. His appointees are a mix of persons in high places that talk a good game of helping citizens but they are surrounded by a sea of activist Federal managers and low-level appointees that are true "partners" with radical groups and their agendas. While they work surreptitiously on creating a Federal Invasive Species mandate, publicly their only suggestion for improving Endangered Species Programs is more money and more power for themselves.

The Congress, for the first time since passage of the Act, has a large number of members who are sensitive to the growing Endangered Species complaints from constituents. The cries for "reform" have attracted attention but the radical groups, radical appointees, bureaucrats and press are out in force. What should be a rosy picture for amending the Endangered Species Act or maybe even revoking the UN Convention that underpins the Act is slowly turning a shiny brown.

First, and perhaps rightly, the perception here at the center of the Universe is that the current Secretary of the Interior and a few other appointees have been so "nice" lately. They won't "List" the Preble's jumping mouse, they are letting certain ranchers shoot a wolf, and they are giving lots of "support" to States that play ball. The perception here in Washington is that there is no longer an army of outraged citizens willing to back the politicians against the radicals and all their allies. What everyone misses here is that EVERYTHING and I do mean EVERYTHING the current appointees give you; the next appointees will have the same power to take away. It is the power taken from State governments and private citizens and given to Federal bureaucrats that MUST be returned or things will only continue to get worse to the point of eventual collapse.

Back to Top  |  Return to James Beers Index  | Back  |  Next Page

Go to - Mainpage IWMC World Conservation Trust