|
From the perspective of economy, ecology
and environmental conservation, hunting is important and justifiable.
However necessary, these justifications are not sufficient to win the day.
The community of hunters has emphasized the effects of recreational
hunting, not actually why they hunt or what hunting does for them as human
beings. In so doing they have left out the very heart of hunting. The
impressive economic impact of hunting and its unparalleled record in
environmental conservation reflect the profound psycho-spiritual influence
of hunting. If we want men who respect life and take responsibility for the
environment, then we must be aware of what hunting does for the male heart.
The hunt is as archetypal to males as birthing is to females. The hunt
marries young men to wild animals and nature just as birthing bonds a young
women to children and life. Men are adapted to take life to serve life.
Hunting itself teaches universal virtues, and the taking of life opens
hearts and engenders respect and responsibility..
Both males and female may benefit much from hunting and fishing (fishing
is hunting with a hook), but boys especially gain from hunting. Initiation
to adulthood is inborn and automatic for women: they leave childhood and
become capable of reproduction with the onset on menses. Not so for boys
who during adolescence are compelled to prove themselves worthy as men. For
hundreds of thousands of years boys have proved themselves worthy by
killing a wild animal of sufficient size. That demonstrates to prospective
brides, in-laws and society their ability to protect and provide.
The instinct to hunt appears early in males. A German scientist examined
behavior in over 60 cultures worldwide. He observed in them all that boys
between the age of 4 and 5 spontaneously begin to throw rocks, often
competing with one another in terms of accuracy or distance. Cultural
conditioning cannot explain the boys’ behavior since in many of the
cultures adult males do not throw rocks or anything else. Moreover, girls
did not exhibit this behavioral pattern. Surely boys are programmed to
begin developing weapon skills early in life, a reflection of the long
history of hunting among human males. We can be equally certain that the
original weapons of our earliest human ancestors were rocks.
Form follows function in evolution, and the human is no exception. The
male shoulder is constructed differently than the female’s and better
suited for throwing, another indication of the male’s adaptation to
hunting. Whether President Jimmy Carter or staunch anti-hunter Cleveland
Amory, most civilized men killed a bird or other small animal as a child.
Normally they did so before initiated to hunting, and many had never seen
anyone else hunt or kill an animal. They use rocks, slingshots, bows or air
rifles.
Just as females are biologically adapted to reproduce, males are adapted
to hunt, kill and provide. The instinct propels them to pursue the animal,
but a surprise awaits them. The same happens to a young man whose rampant
sex drive pushes him towards a sexual encounter. His surprise comes when he
falls in love, not at all what he anticipated. And that is the way normal
human development moves, from lower to higher, in this case, from sexual
instinct (eros) to spiritual love (agape).
From sex to love and marriage the path to fatherhood tempers a man’s
passion, opens his heart and teaches him compassion. The path of the hunt
leads from instinct to the kill. The death of the animal evokes a strong
mix of emotions and self-reflection. It is an ambiguous moment for most
males who, according to surveys I’ve conducted, feel a combination of
elation, sadness and pride. |