|
IWMC World
Conservation Trust,
“Comfortable” with WTO Panel Decision
Dunedian, Florida - 19
October 1998: Eugene Lapointe,
President of the conservation organization, IWMC World Conservation Trust,
today announced that a ruling by the Appellate Body of the World Trade
Organization (WTO), has turned out to be favorable for both conservation
practices and economic development. The WTO Panel ruled in favor of
countries who complained about a U.S. embargo of their shrimp imports. This
embargo was put in place because the countries’ turtle conservation
programs do not include mandatory use of identical turtle excluder devices
(TED) on the nets which American shrimpers have to use. The Panel stated
that the embargo has been in violation of the rules of the international
trade organization. Therefore, the United States must either drop the
embargo or pay a fine for WTO violation in this instance.
Activist organizations had
pushed the U.S. to insist that India, Malaysia, Pakistan and Thailand
should be forced to use turtle exclusion devices on their shrimp nets, a
technique used here to prevent sea turtle deaths. Lapointe noted that the
countries which had been affected by the U.S. embargo, have all had turtle
conservation plans which, although not identical to those in the U.S., have
been internationally praised for their effectiveness. It therefore appears
the U.S. insistence on TEDs may have been unreasonable from a conservation
standpoint.
Lapointe noted that activist
organizations and American Gulf Coast shrimpers, who have to use TEDs
because of U.S. law, were behind the U.S. decision to place an embargo on
imported shrimp. "The activists wanted to raise funds and credibility
on the turtle issue, said Lapointe, while the American shrimpers claim they
are at an economic disadvantage because of the $75 cost of the
device". He pointed out that while this may not seem like much, in
U.S. terms, it could amount to a month's salary in a developing nation.
"Forcing these nations to use the TED devices would have little effect
on the turtles because the harvesting technique is different but could well
put them out of business".
Lapointe called the WTO Panel
ruling a victory for fairness in international economic development while
at the same time, it is not harmful to the cause of sea turtle
conservation, which is very important in principle. He urged that the U.S.
honor the WTO decision by dropping the embargo, and finding a way to ease
the economic burden of American shrimpers, so as to create a “level
playing field” in the shrimp market. Lapointe claimed that "such a
reaction would set a good example for both conservation advocates and
business interests by demonstrating the positive effects of reasonable
compromise". 
For further information,
please contact
Eugene Lapointe, IWMC President,
Former Secretary General of CITES (1982-1990)
Tel/Fax: +1(727) 734-4949 or Email: iwmc@iwmc.org |