|

|
IWMC
World Conservation Trust |
|
NGO Anti-Whale
Meat
Campaign Expanded to Norway |
The
extent and sophistication of the forces, both from NGOs and Government Agencies,
marshaled against whaling cultures and nations can be seen in the most recent
evolution of the anti-consumer campaign being waged against the consumption of
whale meat and blubber. The latest effort to stir up public hysteria over
"contaminated" whale meat has surfaced in Norway and is being fronted
by the prestigious Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF).
WWF announced that samples of whale products purchased in Norwegian markets
"turned up more than 50 PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls)" and that
long term exposure to these chemicals "may cause an increase in cancer,
affect the immune system and reduce sperm counts." Of course, the WWF
spokesman never mentioned the alternative, namely that they "may not"
cause such reactions.
Portraying whale meat and blubber as "tainted" by toxic substances
was a tactic taken by critics of whaling cultures prior to CITES' COP 11. A
handful of self-styled researchers claimed that their analysis of Japanese
consumer products showed whale products in Japanese markets were contaminated
with mercury and other harmful substances. However, as Dr. Milton Freeman
pointed out in IWMC's Convention Tribune published during the recent
International Whaling Commission meetings, the Japanese study was neither peer
reviewed, nor did it reveal anything not already known by the scientific
community.
Dr. Freeman noted that definitive studies of Inuit people consuming so-called
"tainted" marine foods, including a six-year research effort by 80
medical and biological specialists, found that the "well-known health
benefits of consuming marine foods far outweigh the potential negative health
consequences."
Dr. Freeman cites numerous studies, including one by the prestigious U.S.
National Research Council that show the presence of contaminants such as heavy
metals and others (all of which are produced from volcanic reactions and found
naturally on ocean bottoms) do not equate into health risks when consumed by
humans. Ironically, most of the ailments predicted as associated with eating
whale meat are found among non-whale eaters and are virtually non-existent among
whale and marine mammal consuming cultures.
One could dismiss the Norwegian and Japanese "reports" as shameless
emotionalism and shoddy research. One could even suggest that both efforts are
deliberate attempts to politicize science and to misinform the public and policy
makers. Resisting such temptations, one could take another tack. Dr. Freeman
simply points to the work of Cancer Researchers Drs. Bruce Ames and Lois Gold of
the University of California who pointed out that a single cup of coffee
contains over one thousand chemicals, more than half of which are known to cause
cancer in laboratory animals.
WWF's spokeswoman, Cassandra Phillips, stated that "the average
Norwegian consumes only seven ounces of whale meat per year." Hardly a rate
that would threaten the existence of the millions of minke, sperm, and other
whale species inhabiting the earth's oceans.
|