|
eNewsletter |
November/December
2000 |
|

|
IWMC
World Conservation Trust |
|
Sustainable
Use Ally Spots Animal Rights Strategy Inserted into Earth Charter
|
Within
the grand scheme of Animal Rights Groups strategy to end logging, farming,
ranching, hunting, trapping, fishing and virtually every other interaction
directly or indirectly between humans and animals is the codification of a
universal "animal cruelty" law. The Humane Society of the United
States, together with its unofficial sister group, People for the Ethical
Treatment of Animals (PETA), has been preparing the legislative ground for such
a law for the past five years. Now, it seems, HSUS and friends have struck upon
a method to skirt the U.S. Congress and have their goal achieved via a legally
binding international accord, the Earth Charter.
The recent Second IUCN World
Conservation Congress (October 4-11) held in Amman, Jordan saw 2000 participants
from 140 nations converge to discuss and debate the importance of
"ecosystem management" to the earths environmental agenda. Among
the topics offered for consideration was the Earth Charter, a "statement of
fundamental values to guide" humankinds treatment and use of wildlife.
The Earth Charter first came on the environmental scene at the 1992 "Earth
Summit" held in Rio de Janeiro by the United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development (UNCED). At the Amman meetings, Conservation Force
President John Jackson III noted the redrafted "Earth Charter"
contained newly drafted "animal rights" (Principle 1) and "animal
cruelty" language (Principle 15). According to Jackson, the fingerprints on
those sections pointed to HSUS. Former HSUS President, John Hoyt, is a member of
the Earth Charter Commission.
A motion to have IUCN endorse and urge
members to have its principles codified into law failed as the measure was
tabled for "further consideration."
|
Elizabeth,
Regina, and
the Wounded Pheasant |
Britains
Queen Elizabeth outraged that nations anti-hunting zealots when a photo
showing her Majesty appeared in the local newspapers administering the coup de
grace to a wounded pheasant. The British League Against Cruel Sports irately
questioned "the Queens moral judgment" in for not only engaging in
the shooting sports but also "wringing the pheasants neck" with her
bare hands. According to news accounts, the bird was taken from one of the royal
hunting retrievers mouth and upon seeing that it was only wounded, the Queen
finished it off with a quick maneuver wildlife experts agree is a "most
effective" and "humane" way of dispatching the bird.
|