hen
the US Congress was considering the Animal Welfare Act, rats and mice were
excluded because the cost of record keeping would be prohibitive, the effect on
the testing of new medicine would be disastrous, and the public amusement at
such inclusion would have sunk this unnecessary expansion of the Federal
bureaucracy in ridicule and objection.
Now a few years later, Animal Rights organizations write that "we have
arrived at a critical juncture in human progress", and "If our planet
is to survive, mankind must relinquish its role as ‘conqueror’ of
nature." This is the rationale for now including rats and mice under the
Act.
If they are successful, rats and mice will become the objects of numerous
lawsuits and demonstrations. Universities and private labs will greatly diminish
the work they do on behalf of all of us.
Soon, these same organizations will be paying lawyers to argue before the
Supreme Court that these animals have "rights" by citing all the
guarantees that the law provides them already.
This is yet another step in implementing the radical agenda of extremists who
aim to reduce humans to the level of animals by appearing to be concerned about
welfare for animals and thereby elevating the legal status of animals in human
society. Humans are indeed animals, but animals are not human. 