t
is often difficult today to find truly sustainable conservation solutions for
wildlife in face of the unrelenting efforts of wealthy animal rights
organizations throughout the world. However, balance and reason can prevail when
local people pool their resources and interests to achieve objectives of
sustainable wildlife use and habitat conservation. During my recent visit to
Australia for the Southern Hemisphere Marine Mammal conference at Phillip Island
I found my colleague, John McDougall, embroiled in a struggle to ensure that
scientific management and local people were included in decisions concerning
marine resources and their habitats. It is a familiar struggle that IWMC –
World Conservation Trust encounters every day around the globe.
The Marine Protected Area
debate in Victoria, (a southern state of Australia), was driven by a
protectionist "green" lobby faction, intent on achieving a lock-up of
many areas that would have seen six generations of sustainable fishing practices
lost, and brought undue damage to the socio-economic fabric of coastal
communities. Ironically, commercial fishermen and sport anglers were supportive
of no-take sanctuary zones for scientific research and monitoring. They proposed
that multi-use marine parks under an ecologically sustainable framework be
established for these purposes.
In John’s mind, the government appeared to confuse the utilization of
marine protected areas as a fisheries management tool, within already healthy
and sustainable coastal and estuarine fisheries. Furthermore, in its zeal to
push its politically green agenda, the Victorian government invoked a clause in
the state constitution to remove the common law right of commercial fishermen to
any form of compensation as a result of the establishment of the Marine Park and
Sanctuary zones – this was considered heinous throughout the community and NOT
at all consistent with an Ecologically Sustainable Development framework where
environment, social and economic values are considered alongside sustainable use
for conservation.
John had taken every manner of recourse provided, including face-to-face
meetings with the responsible minister, but all to no avail. As a former
commercial fisherman and charter boat operator, John was moved by the inability
of normal government processes to provide access to negotiation and he was
forced to resort to tactics he would otherwise never have dreamed of
undertaking.
John’s plan was to galvanize the support of recreational and commercial
fishermen and mount a campaign to march on the streets of Melbourne, in support
of science, sustainable use and the need for public participation in the
management of marine resources and their habitats. The union of these formerly
polarized factions generated an incredible energy, which spread throughout the
nation and overseas to New Zealand. John’s effort to unite these stakeholders
exposed the inadequacies of the government’s flawed management regime. His
efforts helped to overturn the protectionist dogma of a state government through
political advocacy and by ensuring that the public stakeholders voice for
conservation values and social justice prevailed. His actions also changed a
management that had seen extensive poaching activities in an ineffective, yet
long-established marine national park, which had formerly decimated several
conservation values.
John’s efforts have opened the door to addressing the greater issues of
marine exotic pest infestation, sewage impacts and coastal land degradation. He
has orchestrated media events and displayed incredible passion for conservation,
which has fostered public concern for the environment and focused attention on
issues that he believed were being overlooked. Governments often resort to
protection and regulation, to avoid allocating financial resources to tackle the
most pressing conservation problems.
John’s effort is a good example of what can be achieved if the will to make
a difference, the energies of groups are harnessed for the benefit of the
environment, and the knowledge of good science are applied in a productive
manner. He also learned to apply the emotional tactics used by the green
international protection organizations to change public sentiment, and to
address the greatest potential stumbling block in any public debate, politics! 
| During the final preparation of this
eNewsletter, IWMC received the following from John:
"Yesterday the Victorian Labor government withdrew its Marine National
Park and Marine Sanctuary Bill. A breathing space for us to press further for
our rights. Tomorrow we have a meeting with the Upper House, (Senate) Liberal
party "whip" to work out an alternative. We have until August to come
up with an acceptable plan. A great success so far." Congratulations from
IWMC |