Index  |  Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3     Page 4     Page 5  |  Page 6   |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Download

IWMC - World Conservation Trust
MAINPAGE

SUSTAINABLE USE

ELEPHANTS
FISH
MAMMALS
REPTILES
SEALS
SEA TURTLES
SHARKS
WHALES

ABOUT IWMC

CENSORED

CONTACT IWMC

eNEWSLETTERS
October 
EVENTS CALENDAR
MEDIA RELEASES

SEARCH

WEB LINKS

eNewsletter

October 2001

IWMC
World Conservation Trust

Whale Watching and Consumptive 
Use of Whale Resources 

Editorial by Eugene Lapointe 

Those who oppose any consumptive use of whales commonly cite whale watching as a satisfying and economically advantageous alternative to hunting them. Millions of people who don't know any better, agree in principle. Abolitionist NGOs have insisted that this "passive use" of the animals causes no harm to the populations, and that there is no adverse impact on them. This perspective ignores a number of biological facts.

When any "top of the food chain" species is not itself a prey object, it increases as long as its habitat is favorable, and beyond, until stress conditions prevail. In today's world, large whales and man are in competition for fish and other seafood resources; thus when whales are selectively protected from hunting by man, a perceived imbalance between whales and fish occurs. Both whales and fishermen are consciously impacted by their shared resource use, whether it is space or prey species.

Problems with whales getting themselves entangled in lobster gear, set nets, and purse seines, are commonly reported. More recently, tragic collisions between merchant marine traffic and the seriously endangered Atlantic right whale have been cause for international concern. No one is suggesting that the right whale should be hunted, but that its food supply and its needs to forage and migrate are out of balance with man's needs and presence. Similarly, humpback whales have recovered in the Atlantic and in some other areas, are encountered by fishermen, commercial marine traffic, and of course, by whale watchers.

On July 16, a pregnant humpback whale was found dead, floating in Glacier Bay National Park, in Alaska. Reports from the Park Service and others have led to the conclusion that a cruise ship is likely to have been responsible for the fatal strike. One such vessel in the area at the time was of British registry, and officials are questioning its owners. Humpback whales regularly frequent the Glacier Bay in the summer, because of its rich and diverse food sources. The animals are a major tourist attraction and one of the highlights of any cruise. Because there are so many cruises conducted in the area, and because there are so many humpbacks present during the summer, the animals may not be particularly wary of the vessels, and indeed, many often surface and even breech close to the delighted observers.

The July 16 accident that resulted in the death of the adult whale and its fetus may not even have been avoidable, given the habits of these animals in the presence of cruise vessels. Nevertheless, this turned out to be a form of consumptive use, even though there was no human benefit from the kill. It is neither the first time, nor will it be the last, that whale watchers have inadvertently harmed their "prey". We share their unquestionable remorse and concern, and urge that whale watch advocates put all possible effort into sponsoring research and legislation that may be put to good use in prevention of such consumption in the future. It only makes sense to insist that cruise ships have and use the technology to detect subsurface animals and their speed and direction, so that they may take appropriate evasive action. If this technology is not yet deployed on such vessels, then it is high time to remedy the situation.