|
eNewsletter |
December 2001 |
|

|
IWMC
World Conservation Trust |
|
Consistency in Conservation Decisions
The European Dilemma
|
The 15-member European Union faces
an embarrassing dilemma because of inconsistency of enforcement efforts in the
matter of smuggling of protected wildlife. Some nations in the Union apply
severe fines and stiff jail sentences, while others do not even consider that
wildlife smuggling is a crime. This inconsistency of enforcement effort is
frustrating officials who say that CITES regulations are not being followed,
even though the EU passed a common wildlife trade law four years ago.
A two day workshop was held in Frankfurt, Germany, on November 5 and 6,
sponsored by TRAFFIC, the IUCN, the EU, the CITES Secretariat, WWF Germany,
and the German Wildlife Agency, BFN. The purpose of the meeting was to develop
recommendations to improve wildlife protection through better coordination of
law enforcement networks and consistent guidelines for prosecution and
sentencing. Those attending also called for programs in public education,
since the general public is unaware that a problem exists.
Gross violations of CITES regulations have resulted in illegal trade and
transport into Europe of endangered orangutans, gibbons, reptiles and birds,
according to one IUCN spokesperson, who added that the EU is "one of the
largest marketplaces in the world" for such illegal traffic.
The most significant outcome of the conference was the recommendation that
investigations and prosecutions be uniformly and strictly applied among all EU
members, so as to adequately protect both wildlife species and endangered
habitats all over the world. Two programs for decisions on appropriate fines
and prison terms were discussed and it was anticipated that these would form
the basis of sentencing guidelines across Europe, in a coordinated effort to
combat environmental crime with harsh penalties.
While this effort is commendable, it must be noted that wildlife
conservation in the EU is also in need of some serious consideration. In
France, a ban on trapping of foxes has led to a situation in which some 5,000
people are treated with shots to prevent rabies every year, because the out of
control fox population has its ups and downs in periodic rabies outbreaks, and
rural people are often bitten. In Germany, beaver are now getting so numerous
that they are damaging vast acreages with their dam and flood projects. In the
UK, the ban on trapping has resulted in a similar fox explosion, although
rabies has not entered that country yet through the Chunnel. English red foxes
are invading towns, villages, and even London, where they live on garbage and
handouts from bemused urbanites who don't know how to react to these wild
animals. Also in the UK, feral mink, originally escaped from fur farms, are
wreaking havoc on the island nation's indigenous bird population, yet there
are no plans to curb them through trapping, which is the most efficient and
environmentally safe method of control. Although the Netherlands has banned
trapping, it makes an exception for control of its muskrat population, so as
to keep the heads of the Dutch above water.
In addition to these two issues of inadequate law enforcement of trade in
protected wildlife and the lack of resolve to control species in their own
countries, the EU nations are among the staunchest of those opposed to the
rational management of elephants in Southern Africa and India, and are
adamantly insisting that there be no resumption of commercial whaling for
human consumption, regardless of the abundance of target species, or the
impact of whales on marine habitats and fish stocks.
IWMC regrets that the pressures of certain lobby groups, a poorly informed
and hide-bound media, and a general lack of public education on wildlife
issues, has resulted in this state of affairs in western civilization. True
international maturity and science-based decision making in conservation
issues can only develop when a significant proportion of the citizenry in each
nation is finally affected by its own wildlife problems and made aware of
other environmental dilemmas caused by poor management decisions. That
awareness, communicated to national leaders, can then encourage a long overdue
change in public policy on wildlife and habitat. How long will it take before
Europe and the rest of the West develop their own true conservation courage
and foresight?
|