Index  |  Page 1  |  Page 2     Page 3     Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6   |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Download

IWMC - World Conservation Trust
MAINPAGE

SUSTAINABLE USE

ELEPHANTS
FISH
MAMMALS
REPTILES
SEALS
SEA TURTLES
SHARKS
WHALES

ABOUT IWMC

CENSORED

CONTACT IWMC

eNEWSLETTERS
January 
EVENTS CALENDAR
MEDIA RELEASES

SEARCH

WEB LINKS

eNewsletter

January 2002

IWMC
World Conservation Trust

 
Editorial: Seal Skins are Back!
by Larry Simpson
Department of Sustainable Development
Government of Nunavut

 

Prices for Nunavut ring seals reached an all-time high at the North Bay fur auction in December-averaging $67, up from a similar record of $46 last year. For some years this writer has been in attendance at these auctions, to meet and monitor, and to hand over an incentive award of an Inuit soapstone carving to the highest-value purchaser of Nunavut sealskins. Well, judging by the competitive bidding on just over 6,000 ring seal skins offered, the carving was not really needed. And, the selling price was dramatically higher than the $30 fixed-price our Wildlife Officers have been paying out to Inuit hunters since the market for sealskins collapsed as a result of the anti-sealing agenda. These are nice problems to have, and adjustments will be made accordingly. We are in the process of purchasing sealskins, to set aside the fixed-price system and once again link price to skin quality and anticipated demand. Time for the government to pull back a bit and give some room to market forces.

What a boost for our hunters! An economic boost, and more importantly, a psychological boost for a people with new hope for the common sense of people south-of-60 to use a bountiful renewable resource in a sustainable way, one that can also support people in remote locations and provide an alternative to limited wage-employment opportunities.

The Government of Nunavut of course cannot take full-credit for the rebounding sealskin prices, as they reflect the complexities of changing public and consumer attitudes, the nuances of fashion, and worldwide supply and demand factors. One thing though, the Inuit and the government refused to give up on seals, recognizing the tremendous economic, cultural, and social importance of sealing for their survival as a people. The Nunavut Sealing Strategy was introduced to maintain sealing as an environmentally-responsible means of helping Inuit hunters finance the rising costs of subsistence-harvesting, and to show the "southern" public how sealing helps to preserve diversity in people and cultures. This Strategy includes the sealskin purchase program and participation in the North Bay auction, market and product development (including a new Nunavut Inuit Collection of fashion sealskin coats premiered each year at the Montreal fur show, public education/public relations, and northern business development in the fur sector. Principles regulating the Inuit seal hunt are sustainable use, humane harvesting, and use of the whole animal. Selling the seal skin, a byproduct of the food-driven harvest, is a means of ensuring full use.

Besides being functional and beautiful, sealskins also serve as a useful weathervane for the fortunes of the sustainable use of wildlife in general. When one considers that seals are at the center of one of the decisive ideological battlegrounds between the forces of "sustainable use" and "no use", and that so much is at stake in terms of funding and credibility for a number of animal rights groups (particularly IFAW), this is no mean feat. Seals are not just a flesh and blood creature any more (and their numbers by the way make sustainable harvesting a non-issue), but a metaphor, and an icon. IFAW still insists on using the emotive-image of the whitecoat Harp seal pup for funding and misinformation purposes. That it has been illegal for many years to harvest whitecoat Harp seals in the Newfoundland hunt, and that only adult Ring seals are harvested in Nunavut by rifle, apparently cannot be readily assimilated or recognized by these groups. Sadly, this lack of intellectual integrity and of basic human fairness has hurt the environmental movement as a whole, when it is still much-needed. What happens when people realize that seals are not really an issue, but in fact a good model of humankind in nature? This debacle goes way beyond just crying wolf.