|
eNewsletter |
February 2002 |
|

|
IWMC
World Conservation Trust |
|
Bear Hunt
by Mark Holmes
Communications Specialist
Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters
|
In early December 1999, the radical animal rights movement earned one of its
biggest victories in North America when the government of Ontario, Canada, was
coerced into canceling the spring bear hunt.
This animal rights victory could well have far reaching implications on the
democratic process and wildlife management efforts in countries around the
world.
Pivotal events began in late 1998 when a multi millionaire industrialist and
the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) spearheaded a campaign against
politicians in vulnerable urban-based electoral ridings. Spending millions of
dollars, the IFAW put up billboards featuring children with firearms and
distributed videos of cuddly bear cubs being killed or orphaned. The media
blitz was rounded out with damning radio and print advertisements. The plan by
animal rights groups was to force the cancellation of the spring bear hunt by
threatening to mount an even more vigorous anti hunting, anti government
campaign during the next election mere months away.
The cancellation of the spring bear hunt was made at lightening speed,
leaving hunters, tourism operators, outfitters and even entire communities on
the hook for over $40 million in lost business annually. Of equal concern was
the fact that emotional arguments and radical opinions won over science, truth
and common sense, and animal rights organizations immediately began planning
similar campaigns in Canada and abroad.
The cancellation of the hunt was, according to the Ontario government,
necessary to prevent the accidental orphaning of bear cubs by hunters. However,
evidence has been amassed to clearly show cancellation of the hunt has resulted
in more dead and orphaned bear cubs, and that the cancellation is also illegal
under both provincial and federal law.
The Province of Ontario's own Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act may have
been breached when the spring bear hunt was cancelled, and several sections of
the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms may have also been violated.
Adding fuel to the controversy has been a dramatic rise in the number of
nuisance bear incidents across Ontario since the cancellation of the hunt took
place. Many communities in Ontario are seeking government assistance to deal
with bears that are destroying property, killing livestock, pets, and, on rare
occasions, causing injury to people.
Today, the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters (O.F.A.H.) is on the
verge of a court case that could bring back the hunt, and, at the same time,
reaffirm the constitutional right to hunt and fish. Such a ruling would, to a
large extent, silence the animal rights attack on hunting and fishing heritage
in Canada, and perhaps internationally.
The Court challenge issued by O.F.A.H. has been ongoing since the spring of
1999. A small mountain of evidence has been amassed and numerous court
appearances, affidavits, hours of testimony and appeals are slowing being
cleared to make way for the main case to be heard, possibly sometime in 2002.
Most recently, a court appeal to stop testimony from the Premier of Ontario
and the Minister of Natural Resources on the cancellation of the spring bear
hunt has been heard. But the courts have yet to decide on whether the
government appeal of a lower court decision will stand.
The O.F.A.H. was in court November 22 to argue that both the Premier and the
Minister should testify in the case. The O.F.A.H. contends that the testimony
will be highly relevant to the decision to cancel the spring bear hunt. The
O.F.A.H. has already presented evidence that the Premier ordered the
cancellation of the spring hunt.
The decision to cancel the hunt had nothing to do with science or
conservation. With upward of 150,000 bears, Ontario has one of the largest,
most sustainable, populations of black bears in the world. If the decision is
left to stand unchallenged, it creates a precedent upon which animal rights
groups can mount more political campaigns against other forms of hunting and
fishing.
The O.F.A.H. remains convinced that we have the necessary evidence to win
this case and the return of the spring bear hunt. Any financial help to offset
costs soaring into the hundreds of thousands of dollars is, however, greatly
appreciated. Contributions can be made to the O.F.A.H. Hunting and Fishing
Heritage Fund, Box 2800, Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 8L5.
|