Index  |  Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3     Page 4     Page 5  |  Page 6   |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Download

IWMC - World Conservation Trust
MAINPAGE

SUSTAINABLE USE

ELEPHANTS
FISH
MAMMALS
REPTILES
SEALS
SEA TURTLES
SHARKS
WHALES

ABOUT IWMC

CENSORED

CONTACT IWMC

eNEWSLETTERS
March
EVENTS CALENDAR
MEDIA RELEASES

SEARCH

WEB LINKS

eNewsletter

March 2002

IWMC
World Conservation Trust

 
The Lords be with You!
 

The perennial struggle to demonstrate control of public policy on the environment has once again been expressed through an "animal rights" contest in Great Britain. It was reported in the press that late on March 18th, the Labor Party-dominated House of Commons, joined by Labor leader Prime Minister Blair, voted 386 to 175 in favor of a complete ban on hunting game with dogs. On March 19th, the House of Lords rejected that move, with its own vote of 831 to 74 in favor of licensing, an alternative not considered worthy by the Commons. Both houses had had the options of a ban, a licensing compromise, or of taking no action on the matter.

The UK administration's pattern of action is to consider the political importance to itself of both these vote demonstrations, and to then construct and propose a formal piece of legislation that it hopes will be passed in further action. The voting ritual by both houses of Parliament is carried out as a demonstration of the relative strength of the proposals, which functions as a legislators' opinion poll in the process of law development. No one wants to be on the ultimate losing side of such a matter that reflects actual opinion of the British public on control of traditional practices.

Country citizens view fox hunting with horses and hounds as a revered tradition, and one that contributes strongly both to cultural identity and to local economies. Britain's urban citizens and the ruling Labor Party tend to criticize any hunting, taking note of activist claims that it is "cruel and barbaric" and "unseemly" for an advanced nation to endorse. Political analysts see the struggle as another way for radical NGOs such as the International Fund For Animal Welfare to increasingly control public policy through political threats, and to demonstrate their own growing political influence through these animal issue measures. Red foxes are overtaking the English countryside, and are finding suitable habitat in England's cities, even London, where they are a novelty, a menace, and eaters of rats, handouts, and garbage. So far, the UK has taken every precaution to prevent spread of fox rabies from entering the UK through the Chunnel, from France, where rabies is endemic, and where thousands of people are treated every year after contact with the diseased foxes there.

IWMC notes that the UK stand on the whaling issue parallels this recent NGO-Labor Party-coalition power demonstration on fox hunting. Similarities are reluctance or outright refusal to consider compromises in wildlife management instead of outright bans on hunting. Home politics has become a priority over the common welfare.

IWMC considers the process in the UK a sad reflection of a global process of increasing power by green NGOs to control policy more by contrived public preferences than by use of science, or compassion for people. Governments, even constitutional monarchies, are supposed to function for the good of their constituents, not just for the crass reasons of perpetuating their own power bases through a process of least public criticism. IWMC endorses and hopes to see develop, a legislative and administrative process that will support both rural cultural tradition and practical control of Britain's wildlife.