|

|
IWMC
World Conservation Trust |
|
Editorial: Milking the
Shock Value
of Cultural Insult
by Janice Henke, Anthropologist
|
PETA
has done it again, and the media have lapped it up, as the vegetarian zealots
knew they would. Just before Easter this year, PETA erected a billboard in
Jackson, Mississippi, that shows an image of the Virgin Mary breastfeeding the
baby Jesus. The caption accompanying the sign reads "If it was good enough
for Jesus…" Naturally, enraged citizens demanded that it be taken down,
but PETA spokespersons used the controversy to further their campaign against
the dairy industry. Catholic League president William Donohue reportedly
asserted that "The idea of showing the Blessed Mother breastfeeding baby
Jesus to make a cheap point about vegetarian rights is outrageous." The
ploy for media attention had worked again, and the outrage of their fellow
citizens was a side effect that added to PETA's notoriety, which, of course,
was their goal.
We note that in New York State, some farms have recently suffered mysterious
contamination of their bulk milk tanks, with antibiotics. Of course, this is
detected before the milk leaves the farm, as the pick-up tank truck driver
tests each farm's product before loading it on. Any contaminants or a high
bacteria count are reason for rejection of the milk before it can contaminate
the common supply. The farmer is then faced with disposal of hundreds of
gallons of milk and with the loss of income for the day's supply, as well as
the cost of disinfecting the entire operation, investigating the cause, and
preventing a recurrence. Law enforcement officials have not yet found the
culprits who have done this, but farmers remember the PETA anti-dairy campaign,
and are glad that the FBI has been brought in to investigate. Theories of who
may have done this range from anti-dairy activists to disgruntled former
employees, and security is now an added expense for farmers whose operations
are barely profitable without this kind of trouble.
Make no mistake; PETA is not concerned about the health of infants or
children, nor about the treatment of dairy cows, or about the environment. PETA
wants to put an end to the ownership of animals by people, an end to the
consumption of milk products and meat, and an end to the use of animals for
medical research, transportation, sport, and entertainment. They do this by
attempting to frighten, insult, disgust, and coerce people who keep and use
animals and their products. The goal is to change the culture of animal users
everywhere, and PETA's tactics range from the ludicrous to support of behavior
that is criminal. This is disrespect for any culture that does not conform to
their worldview. Such behavior must not be allowed to go beyond the limits of
freedom of speech that many people cherish.
|