Index  |  Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4     Page 5     Page 6   |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Download

IWMC - World Conservation Trust
MAINPAGE

SUSTAINABLE USE

ELEPHANTS
FISH
MAMMALS
REPTILES
SEALS
SEA TURTLES
SHARKS
WHALES

ABOUT IWMC

CENSORED

CONTACT IWMC

eNEWSLETTERS
April
EVENTS CALENDAR
MEDIA RELEASES

SEARCH

WEB LINKS

eNewsletter

April 2002

IWMC
World Conservation Trust

 
"Seal Wars" Chapter 1:
Safe Sex for Seals

 

Once upon a time when people were sensible and there were no animal rights activists and environmentalists, problems with wildlife were handled locally, quickly and efficiently. No one worried about it. Today, when species get out of hand, everyone affected worries about it but no one can dare to do anything, for fear that "they" will present it to the media in such a way that elected officials will lose their jobs.

In some parts of the oceans, certain abundant whales are overfishing the marine ecosystem to the detriment of fish stocks, sea birds, and human fishermen. And in Scotland, fishermen know that the gray seals are eating their fish and worse, that the seals carry the dreaded "seal worm", a parasite that infests fish flesh to the extent that processing plants must spend thousands of pounds to have workers remove the offending worms - sometimes there are so many that fillets end up being flaked fish, which brings a much lower price than do fillets.

Gray seals not only compete with fishermen for fish, but they diminish the value of what humans do catch, and gray seals are increasing so rapidly on Scotland's coasts, that they are expected to reach 200,000 animals within a decade. But the British authorities dare not shoot the seals to control their population. Why? one might ask. Because activists will go to the media and the voters, aroused by activist claims of "inhumane, cruel, mindless slaughter", will demand an alternative solution. After all, that is what happened back in 1978 when the population of gray seals was "culled" by hunters for the same reasons.

So in the year 2002, in order to solve the problem, British sharpshooters are armed with dart guns that carry doses of a substance called an immunocontraceptive virus, which is designed to cause female seals to fail to ovulate for up to two years. 200 female gray seals are to be darted in a pilot program that, it is hoped, will keep the herd from growing, and will keep officials in office with their kind reputations intact. Of course, this will not solve the sealworm problem, nor will it be a permanent solution.

Remember the old joke about the same controversy in the American West? The rancher who wanted the government agents to shoot marauding coyotes was trying to explain to an environmentalist at a public meeting, why this was the preferred method. She wanted the animals to be sterilized instead of shot. "Ma'am, he politely explained, they're not …..ing my sheep, they're eating them." Scotland's fishermen probably feel the same way about their fish and their gray seals. But the seals won't care. To them, it's going to be just one big, endless party of seals coming into estrus, bull seals pursuing them, and no pups to care for, while they all chow down as usual. Party on, seal lovers.

Once again, this is not about the animals in question. For both activists and government decision makers, it is about power - getting it, keeping it, exerting it, losing it, protecting it, and worrying about all the above. The fishermen lose, and so does the trusting public, in this endless process of green activism working in ways that ironically, harm both the environment and the people who depend upon it.

(Source: Hunters aim to put seals on the pill. Jeremy Watson.
31 March 2002 - Scotland on Sunday development.)