Index  |  Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6   |  Page 7     Page 8     Page 9  |  Download
 

IWMC - World Conservation Trust

SEARCH

MAINPAGE
SUSTAINABLE USE
eNEWSLETTER
July
MEDIA CENTER

ELEPHANTS
FISH
MAMMALS
REPTILES
SEALS
SEA TURTLES
SHARKS
WHALES

ABOUT IWMC

CENSORED

CONTACT IWMC

EVENTS CALENDAR
WEB LINKS

Sustainable eNews

July 2002

IWMC
World Conservation Trust

 
"Science War"
Chapter 3 - Milking the Cows...

 

 

Under this title, IWMC is presenting a case of the abuse and misuse of science by activists, to illustrate that their goals and the strategies used to achieve them, are neither in the public interest, nor in concurrence with scientific principles relevant to human health and well being. We are not alone in this, as the American Medical Association, the National Academy of Sciences, the US Forest Service, and the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission, have repeatedly contradicted the pseudoscientific claims of animal rights and eco-activists.

People For the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) wishes that everyone would stop milking cows, breeding cows, or keeping them for any reason. Since this wish has not been fulfilled in any country that has traditionally used bovines, the organization has resorted to a number of tactics that are intended to persuade cow keepers and their consumer customers to give it up.

One such tactic has been use of the "yuck" factor; PETA claims that milk is laden with antibiotics, blood and pus from chronic infections in animals that they claim are milked until it hurts. What the consuming public doesn't know is that USDA regulations make sure that milk is tested at the farm (before it is allowed into the tank truck), and at the processing plants for impurities and excess bacterial levels, and a farmer whose product is unfit, is refused the right to sell that milk until the herd product tests come back clean. Thus, neither unclean nor medicine-laden milk will enter the mainstream of product being sold for human consumption. One who is unaware of the USDA oversight program would never know that milk is safe, however, if that person should go to the PETA website, which contains really gross and inaccurate descriptions of cows' milk that reaches the table.

Another tactic PETA regularly uses has to do with claims that milk drinking "causes" diabetes, heart conditions, fat children, and even prostate cancer. A recent PETA billboard ad, showing the former New York City mayor with a milk mustache and a "Got Prostate Cancer?" caption, was pulled when Rudy threatened to sue the organization. Contrary to the bogus junk science claims of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, there is no scientific evidence that even remotely suggests that milk is bad for humans. Dr. Neil Barnard, a close associate of PETA founder Ingrid Newkirk, is the head of PCRM. It has been obvious to many for years, that the Physicians Committee is merely a poorly disguised mouthpiece for PETA, masquerading under the white coat "scientific" costume. The Physicians' Committee is composed of 5% medical doctors, and the rest of the organization is lay persons with a preference for veganism.