|
Sustainable
eNews |
August 2002 |
|

|
IWMC
World Conservation Trust |
|
Shark Stories
Herald
Another CITES Meeting
|
We know it's time for CITES when we start hearing
about danger to sharks from people.
A dead shark found on fishing gear off Australia recently attracted a
great deal of attention because of the animal's size. The Great White was
frozen and later studied by scientists who were interested in its
fertility, general health, huge size, bite marks on its body indicating
mating activity, and so forth. Peter Benchley, author of "Jaws",
got into the act in a television special that focused on the danger to
sharks that results when people fish for other species. Sharks often take
fish that are caught on long lines. They get themselves caught, and
drowned, in the process.
According to some, if people would just stop fishing at all, sharks
would benefit. This plan of action is not likely to be accepted by
responsible fishermen anywhere. Sometimes, sharks that are by-catch are
saved and utilized, in whole or in part. Sometimes, they are of a species
that no one wants, and so they are discarded. Markets are not uniformly
available, and some species are so ammonia-scented, that to keep them on
board, would taint the rest of the catch. In some cases, the fins are saved
and the rest of the carcass is discarded. There are many reasons for the
ways in which sharks are treated after they are caught.
In the EU, politicians and extreme NGOs recently cooperated to create
legislation that would make it illegal to hunt sharks "just for the
fins", as if that would be a benefit to the conservation of these
animals. A similar piece of legislation back in 1983 prevented the import
of the products of seals under the age of one year. These animals had been
killed "just for their skins", which was a lie, but the claim
worked to cause EU legislators to ban the product. The EU shark finning ban
is a reaction to "environmentalist" information that the market
for fins is endangering all species of sharks. Interestingly, the proposed
regulation would not prohibit the use of shark fins as long as all the rest
of the animal is utilized.
The market for shark meat is different in different cultures, and for
different species of sharks. Some people consider some shark meat inedible.
Some people consider it a delicacy. Some shark meat is less intensely
flavored than others are, and so forth. There is no "general
truth" about the broad term "shark meat" because there is
quite a difference among species. The new EU regulations on shark fishing
may be very difficult to enforce, and are of questionable conservation
benefit.
The United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) has for
years, been concerned with the conservation of marine fish species, and
this organization is the one which should continue to be relied upon for
scientific information on shark conservation.
Included in this activity are the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible
Fisheries, and the FAO International Action Plan for sharks. CITES is not,
therefore, an appropriate forum for discussions or official action on trade
in shark species and shark products, since the FAO has acquired the
expertise in this area. Incidentally, there is less green NGO influence in
FAO Committee on Fisheries meetings than there is at CITES.
Therefore, we at IWMC feel confident that the FAO should remain the body
responsible for major decisions about shark conservation. Inclusion of
sharks on the CITES agenda would be inappropriate and not helpful to the
conservation of these top of the food chain species.
|