he government of Namibia has entrusted a number of
organizations called conservancies with the management and conservation of
wild game and natural habitats.
The leaders of these conservancies protect and count their wildlife, and
make informed decisions on hunting quotas, in order to keep their lands and
animals in as harmonious a balance as possible. Game guides and scouts keep
a watch for poachers, and in general, the conservancies feel a special
pride that they have been entrusted with this large responsibility. Tourism
and hunting are both adding to the local economies through use of the
conservancies, although hunting has been noted to add vastly more to the
economic support than does tourism. Such enterprises are expensive to
operate properly. When animals are killed, the local villagers use the
meat, and local people are trained by conservancy leaders to be game
guides, and to watch out for poachers. The employment and the use of the
meat are extremely important in a country whose people are "protein
starved" compared to people in Europe and North America.
Maggi Barnard, a writer who knows Namibia and its problems, has
described a recent dispute between conservancy leaders and a protectionist
organization, Save the Rhino Trust, or SRT. The latter is calling for a ban
on hunting in the Kunene Region, a dry and mountainous area, claiming that
hunting is disadvantageous to the tourism industry.
Conservancy leaders counter with the information that there should be no
conflict in the huge game reserves between tourism and hunting, because the
hunting is done on foot, and is not done at water holes unless a specific
problem animal has to be eliminated, in which case, hunting by the water
hole is the most efficient method. Therefore, hunting does not disrupt
animal behavior to any great extent, and because it is only infrequently
done at water holes, does not conflict with tourism, which depends on areas
around water holes for the greater concentrations of game to be viewed.
This dispute in Namibia is just another example of the modern day
protectionist propaganda that tourism and active management carried out by
hunting can not successfully co-exist. We see it in the whaling issue, and
now it is becoming more common in Africa, where it is essential that large
game species be kept under strict population control so that people,
animals, and the general environment shall all prosper in a balance as
close to nature's own as possible.
IWMC wishes the leaders of Namibia's conservancies a successful
resolution to the current dispute. Hunting should be supported in
perpetuity there, and at present, is fully supported by the Ministry of the
Environment and Tourism of Namibia, whose spokesperson has noted that the
200,000 hectare area of conservancies is well supervised, continually
monitored for all activities, and that game are replenished when necessary.
We agree with this policy of full sustainable utilization of the resources
of Namibia by and for its own people.