Index  |  Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6   |  Page 7     Page 8     Page 9  |  Download .DOC Download.PDF

IWMC - World Conservation Trust

SEARCH

MAINPAGE
SUSTAINABLE USE
eNEWSLETTER
September
MEDIA CENTER

ELEPHANTS
FISH
MAMMALS
REPTILES
SEALS
SEA TURTLES
SHARKS
WHALES

ABOUT IWMC

CENSORED

CONTACT IWMC

EVENTS CALENDAR
WEB LINKS

Sustainable eNews

September 2003

IWMC
World Conservation Trust

 
Canada's Legislature debates
Human vs Animal Rights

 

A very basic test of human rights, common sense, and conservation principles is being played out in Canada right now, both in the House of Commons and in the Senate. Bill C10B concerns the rights of people to kill animals for any reason. The proposed legislation has gone back and forth between the Senate (whose members are appointed for life) and the House of Commons. Discussions have ranged from the rights of aboriginal peoples to conduct their traditional hunting and fishing activities, to other rural people and those who wish to enter the countryside and hunt for recreational purposes. The latter is a business of considerable economic and conservation importance in Canada, as elsewhere. The bill is about the rights of people to kill animals. It is part of an underlying agenda that has little or nothing to do with concern for animal welfare, human health, or conservation measures.

Senate amendments to the House bill have caused different versions of the legislation to pass between houses more than several times in recent months. At present, those who are concerned with the future of the rights of people to kill animals are convinced that a core of animal rights activists in the Justice Department and the House of Commons is determined to see this through as a test case for permanent prohibition, a victory for a power hungry minority. A wider concern is that this shall eventually not be confined to Canada, but may provide a model for similar legislation in the United States, whose animal rights leaders are alleged to be the economic force behind this Canadian initiative.

The disastrous potential consequences of such legislation include nutritional, social, psychological, and economic upheaval, to say nothing of the environmental impacts of such a stupid national decision. Yet, Canada beware. Never say "It can't happen here", but rather, become personally involved in communicating public opinion to the Senators and MEPs who are toying incessantly with this concept.

The bill is not about cruelty to animals. It is about the freedom, health and welfare of the people and the environment of Canada, and their right to live life as usual without being forced to become vegetarians. IWMC urges all Canadians to watch the process very closely, and not to trust that the system is necessarily working in their best interests.