Index  |  Page 1     Page 2     Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6   |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Download .DOC Download.PDF

IWMC - World Conservation Trust

SEARCH

MAINPAGE
SUSTAINABLE USE
eNEWSLETTER
October
MEDIA CENTER

ELEPHANTS
FISH
MAMMALS
REPTILES
SEALS
SEA TURTLES
SHARKS
WHALES

ABOUT IWMC

CENSORED

CONTACT IWMC

EVENTS CALENDAR
WEB LINKS

Sustainable eNews

October 2003

IWMC
World Conservation Trust

 
Iceland Finds Greenpeace and
Other Threats are All Wet

 

The bottom line is, nothing bad has happened to Iceland in economic or political retaliation for the government's decision to conduct an initial scientific research-whaling program. Norway's whalers and tour operators have been telling them that, all along, but Iceland had to find out firsthand. Despite dire threats from Greenpeace that the bullies of the sea would persuade tourists not to visit Iceland -- threats disguised behind a promise that they would incite tourists to visit Iceland if it would renounce to its whaling activities -- guess where the best increases in tourism originated? Great Britain and Germany, two of the staunchest anti-whaling IWC Parties, saw more of their citizens heading for Iceland this year than last. According to the High North Alliance, the Iceland tourism board tallied 25% more Brits and 77% more Germans than last year who visited Iceland this September.

Greenpeace, "mafia of the sea" to some, has not brought Iceland to her knees, and has not had an impact on the national policy of any nation to the extent that trade or economic reciprocity has been affected in any way. Even though the Superpower has made hints of economic threats, these are not expected to be fulfilled, any more than they were when the US threatened Norway or Canada, over those nations' whaling activities. No country wishes to take the chance of embarrassment if it should impose trade sanctions that would be a violation of obligations under the terms of the World Trade Organization. It would just be too much hassle, and might unleash unpleasant repercussions at home.

Whale on, Iceland. We have confidence that you are doing so within your sovereign rights under both the IWC and the United Nations Law of the Sea, and within appropriate scientific guidelines. Yes, we recognize that your goal is to discover whether or not minke (any perhaps other species) shall be able to withstand a consistent moderate level of commercial harvest. And, we understand that your scientists want to know the ecological impact that whales are having on your marine environment. These are all politically correct, ecologically correct, and socially appropriate goals. Best of luck from IWMC and all our supporters who are watching this world stage drama.

Back to Top  |  Return to Index  | Back  |  Next Article