When the Conference of the Parties to CITES adopted its listing criteria
(Resolution Conf. 9.24), it recognized that these criteria may not be fully
suitable, in particular for certain categories of species. Therefore, it agreed
that the whole Resolution should be reviewed before COP 12.
Terms of reference for the review of the criteria will be discussed at COP
11: Specialists in marine fish species in particular expressed serious
concerns with regard to the CITES criteria. Following a recommendation from the
FAO Committee on Fisheries (COFI), the FAO, which clearly has competence in this
matter, will conduct a scientific review of the CITES listing criteria and
report to CITES. The Government of Japan encourages CITES Parties to respect the
forthcoming comments from FAO on this matter. In addition, the FAO has developed
plans of action to reduce seabird by-catch in fisheries, conserve sharks, and to
manage fishing fleet over-capacity. Given that CITES listing criteria do not
appear appropriate for commercially harvested marine fish species and that
revised criteria will not be available before COP 12, the Government of Japan
recommends that COP 11 reject proposals for the listing of such, until
satisfactory criteria have been adopted. Regional management organizations and
the FAO rather than CITES are in fact the appropriate organizations to implement
conservation management regimes for these species.
CITES Procedures -Secret Ballot: It is likely there will be attempts at
COP 11 to change the CITES Rules of Procedure, which provide for the use of
secret ballots. This is an important matter of principle since the secret ballot
allows CITES Parties to vote as they see fit, without coercion or fear of
reprisals from other Parties or NGOs. Such coercion and threats of reprisals
have occurred in the past both within the IWC and CITES against those countries
supportive of sustainable use of certain species. Reprisals have included
boycotts of significant export items and of the tourism industries of a number
of small developing states. Secret ballots were used reasonably at CITES COP 10
and are a part of the operating procedures in many international organizations.
Arguments against the use of secret ballots based on openness and
transparency have become a part of the rhetoric of many NGOs and powerful
nations but these arguments essentially sacrifice the fundamental rights of
smaller and less powerful nations to exercise their vote according to their own
opinion. Every effort should be made at COP 11 to maintain the option to use the
secret ballot in the CITES Rules of Procedure as it existed at COP 10 in order
to safeguard democratic practices and the independence of individual Parties, as
well as the CITES credibility as a responsible organization bases its decisions
on science rather than emotionalism and the political positions of its strongest
members.