Page 1 

|

 Page 2 

 

 Page 3 

 

IWMC - World Conservation Trust
MAINPAGE

SUSTAINABLE USE

2nd Symposium
Journal of
Sustainable Use


Introduction

Table of Contents

I Ceremonial
II Terrestrial
Resources
III  Aquatic Resources
 Marine
 Mammals
IV Issues of Relevance

The Government of Japan's Whale Downlisting Proposals for CITES
Mr. Joji Morishita
Mr. Dan Goodman

Institute of Cetacean Research, Tokyo, Japan


Proposals for Listing of Commercially
Harvested Marine Fish Species

When the Conference of the Parties to CITES adopted its listing criteria (Resolution Conf. 9.24), it recognized that these criteria may not be fully suitable, in particular for certain categories of species. Therefore, it agreed that the whole Resolution should be reviewed before COP 12.

Terms of reference for the review of the criteria will be discussed at COP 11: Specialists in marine fish species in particular expressed serious concerns with regard to the CITES criteria. Following a recommendation from the FAO Committee on Fisheries (COFI), the FAO, which clearly has competence in this matter, will conduct a scientific review of the CITES listing criteria and report to CITES. The Government of Japan encourages CITES Parties to respect the forthcoming comments from FAO on this matter. In addition, the FAO has developed plans of action to reduce seabird by-catch in fisheries, conserve sharks, and to manage fishing fleet over-capacity. Given that CITES listing criteria do not appear appropriate for commercially harvested marine fish species and that revised criteria will not be available before COP 12, the Government of Japan recommends that COP 11 reject proposals for the listing of such, until satisfactory criteria have been adopted. Regional management organizations and the FAO rather than CITES are in fact the appropriate organizations to implement conservation management regimes for these species.

CITES Procedures -Secret Ballot: It is likely there will be attempts at COP 11 to change the CITES Rules of Procedure, which provide for the use of secret ballots. This is an important matter of principle since the secret ballot allows CITES Parties to vote as they see fit, without coercion or fear of reprisals from other Parties or NGOs. Such coercion and threats of reprisals have occurred in the past both within the IWC and CITES against those countries supportive of sustainable use of certain species. Reprisals have included boycotts of significant export items and of the tourism industries of a number of small developing states. Secret ballots were used reasonably at CITES COP 10 and are a part of the operating procedures in many international organizations.

Arguments against the use of secret ballots based on openness and transparency have become a part of the rhetoric of many NGOs and powerful nations but these arguments essentially sacrifice the fundamental rights of smaller and less powerful nations to exercise their vote according to their own opinion. Every effort should be made at COP 11 to maintain the option to use the secret ballot in the CITES Rules of Procedure as it existed at COP 10 in order to safeguard democratic practices and the independence of individual Parties, as well as the CITES credibility as a responsible organization bases its decisions on science rather than emotionalism and the political positions of its strongest members.

  

Back to Top  |  Return to Aquatic Index  | BackNext Article


Go to - Mainpage IWMC World Conservation Trust