|
Aspects of Regional
Management:
Science, Sustainable Use and Conservation
of Marine Mammals in the
North Atlantic
Dr. Grete Hovelsrud-Broda, Ph.D.
General Secretary
NAMMCO
|

|
|
Within the framework of sustainable use, it is assumed that a natural
resource is used to keep a community viable and to be conserved so that the next
generation will also be able to meet their needs: A resource must be used within
the capacity for renewal.
Sustainable use of renewable resources combined with an effort to keep
communities sustainable/viable, leads to questions regarding markets, cash and
income. All contemporary societies are dependent upon a steady cash flow, and in
for example many small communities in Greenland, marine mammal products remain
an important source of cash. On the other hand, the pilot whale hunt drives in
the Faroe Islands do not generate cash directly, but are an important source of
meat for the households. In this sense the monetary replacement value is
probably high. The income generated by marine mammal harvesting in Norway is
also important to the overall economy of the whaling and sealing communities.
Cash income and the nutritional value of marine mammals are likely to be
important aspects of Icelandic whaling, if resumed. In all these cases, the
social and cultural values of marine mammal hunting and the subsequent
consumption and distribution of the foodstuffs must not be overlooked.
One obstacle to the sustainability of marine mammal use in some of the NAMMCO
countries is the trade ban on sealskins in Europe (skins from harp and hooded
seal-pups only) and the U.S. (all marine mammal products). The sealskin trade
ban is not driven by market principles (i.e. international trade issues), and it
is no longer motivated by a need to protect endangered species, or by concerns
for environmental degradation. It is motivated by animal protectionist arguments
stemming from a claim in the 1970s - 1980s, that, in particular, harp and hooded
seals were endangered. Later, when it was understood that these species were not
endangered, the focus of the anti-sealing controversy shifted to include all
seal species. This is because perspectives of humane killing of animals and
animal rights motivated the protests against sealing (and whaling). Seals and
whales have a unique appeal and the notion that they are killed is disagreeable
to many Western people. (This is a large and very interesting topic, but is
beyond the scope of this paper.)
Marine Mammal Use in the NAMMCO Countries:
A Brief Sketch.
What is perhaps unique about NAMMCO is that all signatories have a long
history of, and are currently utilizing (or have until recently utilized) marine
mammals as a resource. The NAMMCO member countries share a common concern for
the various species roaming the North Atlantic Ocean. Marine mammals are
important to the economy, for nutrition and to the social organization of many
communities in these countries.
Faroe Islands
Pilot-whale hunting in the Faroe Islands probably came to the islands with
the Vikings from the Norwegian West Coast. As early as 1298 a legal document
outlined who had the rights to the whales, both driven and stranded. Pilot-whale
hunting in the Faroe Islands is opportunistic because the animals are driven
towards and killed on the beach only when observed along the coast from boats or
from land. Before the whales can be driven into one of the 23 approved bays
distributed throughout the country to be killed, the hunt has to be authorized
by government officials. The pilot whale hunt drive is not a commercial
activity. The meat and the blubber are distributed, free of charge, to the
inhabitants in the area where the whales are killed. The pilot whale is an
important source of food; about one third of the annual total of meat produced
in the Faroes comes from these whales (Anonymous, 1999). The pilot-whale drive
hunts are instrumental in maintaining a way of life and important cultural
values in the Faroe Islands.
|