Flag of convenience (FOC) vessels are fishing vessels re-flagged to
non-member States of regional fisheries management organizations in order to
avoid compliance with or to undermine international fisheries conservation and
management measures. More than 300 vessels of such character have been
identified and recognized as one of the major threats to the sustainable use of
marine fisheries resources. Products from FOC vessels also compete with seafood
products harvested by legitimate fishing operations. Since FOC vessels are not
paying necessary costs for management, their products are cheaper and have
advantages over legitimate products in the market. Furthermore, FOC vessels are
competing with legitimate fishing vessels over the share of fishing grounds.
The FOC problems have been the subject of serious discussions by
international organizations including the UN Food and Agriculture Organization
(FAO), APEC, and many regional fisheries management organizations. Their
recommendations include:
- Collection of Information, Monitoring
- Restriction/ Prohibition of Vessels Transfer
- Restriction/ Prohibition of Transfer of Expertise and Capital
- Political and Diplomatic Pressures
- Other Discouragements (port call, transshipment)
- Other Market Measures (labelling)
This demonstrates that a comprehensive approach is needed to handle the issue
of FOC. The same can be said for all the issues of conservation and management
of marine fisheries resources. Therefore, listing fishery resources in
Appendices of CITES, which deals with international trade only, is not effective
and not appropriate.
1) What is Flag of Convenience (FOC)? Fishing vessels reflagged to non-member
States of Regional Fisheries Management Organizations in order to avoid
compliance with or to undermine international fisheries conservation and
management measures. More than 300 identified.
2) Problems. Resource conservation and management; market competition;
fisheries competition.
3) Actions by International Organizations. The Rome Declaration on the
Implementation of the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (paragraph (j),
March 1999). Resolution by ICCAT concerning the Unreported and Unregulated
Catches of Tunas by Large Scale Longline Vessels in the Convention Area (1998).
Recommendations by the Ad-hoc Workshop of the APEC Fisheries Working Group on
Fisheries Management to the APEC Fisheries Working Group on the Issue of Flag of
Convenience Fishing Vessels (July, 1999). Recommendation concerning Registration
and Exchange of Information on Vessels, including Flag of Convenience Vessels,
Fishing for Tropical Tunas in the IOTC Area of Competence (December 1998).
Resolution on Catches of Southern Bluefin Tuna by Flag of Convenience Fishing
Vessels (1999)
4) What can be done ? · Collection of information, monitoring ·
Restriction/prohibition of vessels transfer · Restriction/prohibition of
transfer of expertise and capital · Political and diplomatic pressures · Trade
related measure · Other discouragements (port call, transshipment) · Consumer
education · Other market measures (labelling).
5) Conclusion. Comprehensive approach is needed, not CITES listings.