When CITES was adopted in Washington in 1973, the hawksbill turtle was listed
in Appendix I and II. A subspecies of the Atlantic Ocean and Caribbean (Eretmochelys
imbricata imbricata) was listed in Appendix I and a subspecies of
the Indian and Pacific Oceans (E. imbricata bissa) in
Appendix II. At the first meeting of the Conference of the Parties (Berne,
1976), E. imbricata bissa was transferred from Appendix II to Appendix I
and as a result, the species as a whole was listed in Appendix I.
When Japan became a Party to CITES in 1980, Japan entered a reservation with
regard to the hawksbill turtle in accordance with Article XXIII of the
Convention because it believed that the hawksbill was not endangered. As such,
even if Japan was a Party to CITES, Japan continued to import bekko materials
legally. At that time, there was some international criticism against Japan
because Japan imported bekko materials from Party states. At its fourth meeting
(Gaborone, 1983), the Conference of the Parties adopted Resolution Conf. 4.25 on
effects of reservations. If Japan accepts the Resolution, it would become
impossible to import bekko materials from Parties without a reservation. As a
result, Japan was forced to limit its trade partners to non-Parties and Parties
with a reservation such as the Solomon Islands and Cuba even if such a
limitation might be detrimental to the status of the species.
When Japan entered a reservation in 1980, it established its import quota of
30 tonnes. In 1989, the bekko industry decided to reduce its import quota to 20
tonnes. In November 1990, the industry held an international symposium in
Nagasaki and invited many marine turtle scientists at the industry's expenses.
Those invitees included many famous scientists such as George Balazs from
Hawaii, Colin Limpus from Queensland and some NGO activists such as Marydell
Donnelly from the Center for Marine Conservation (CMC). It is this symposium
that Cuba was first exposed to international arena in terms of the management of
marine turtles. In his closing remark, then President of JBA Mr. Nakakoga
announced that the industry would further reduce the import and limit its
trading partners to only those which have sufficient management programme for
the hawksbill turtle. For unknown reasons, American NGOs including the National
Wildlife Federation asked the U.S. in 1991 to certify that Japan was undermining
CITES Convention. In early 1991, the U.S. announced that it was considering a
possibility of imposing economic sanction under Pelly Amendment against Japan.
Many American NGOs started working with the US Government. For example, CMC
issued a press release condemning Japan (Kaneko, 1992). Amongst others, CMC
mentioned explicitly that many American NGOs believed that it would be
inappropriate to hold the eighth meeting of the Conference of the Parties in
Japan in 1992 unless Japan withdrew its reservation. Even CMC said that many
NGOs had asked the U.S. to change the venue of the Conference of the Parties
from Japan to other country.
Bilateral negotiation started in 1991 between the U.S. and Japan. Under the
threat of Pelly Amendment, Japan decided to ban the importation of bekko
effective the end of 1992 and withdrew its reservation in 1994. This was
announced by Japan at the eighth meeting of the Conference of the Parties
(Kyoto, 1992).
At the tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties (Harare, 1997), Cuba
submitted a proposal to transfer its hawksbill turtle population from Appendix I
to II. That proposal obtained a simple majority but did not reach a two-thirds
majority as required under the Convention. Thus, the importation of bekko into
Japan remained prohibited for almost seven years.