Page 1 

|

 Page 2 

 

 Page 3 

 

 Page 4 

 

IWMC - World Conservation Trust
MAINPAGE

SUSTAINABLE USE

2nd Symposium
Journal of
Sustainable Use


Introduction

Table of Contents

I Ceremonial
II Terrestrial
Resources
III  Aquatic Resources
 Specific
 Aspect
 Other
IV Issues of Relevance

The United States Marine Mammal Protection Act:
Challenges to Inuit Sustainable
Resource Use in Canada

Scot Nickels

Inuit Tapirisat of Canada


What these organizations do best, it seems, is to work internationally on barriers which have great effect in our small communities. The United States Marine Mammal Protection Act, for example, which was passed in 1972, involved the active lobbying of the Humane Society of the United States. This Act totally eliminated all trade to the United States for Canadian Inuit in marine mammal products. This happened to Inuit within 60 days of the passage of the Act, despite the fact that Canadian Inuit have traded with the Inupiat of Alaska and, for that matter, with Inuit in what is now Russia and Greenland long before our contact with Europeans. To this day, any import of Canadian Inuit marine mammal products into the United States results in the importer being charged with an offence equivalent to the importation of narcotics.
 

An incident which reveals the striking inadequacy of the Marine Mammal Protection Act occurred early this summer. In this incident, seven Inuit marionettes from the community of Pelly Bay were sent to a Rhode Island puppet master for repairs. These marionettes were to be used in an initiative by Inuit elders to teach their children Inuit history. The puppets were made with locally available material such as ring seal skins, caribou and musk ox hair - from non-endangered species - and from beached bone from beluga whales.

Despite the fact that these puppets were made from animals abundant in the north and were not intended for sale but for educational purposes only, the elders from Pelly Bay were viewed as committing a statutory offence under the U.S. Marine Mammal Protection Act. Because the puppets contained materials from seal and whale, materials banned from crossing the United States border under the Act, they were seized at the border and slated to be destroyed. Various forensic studies were conducted to authenticate the materials origins and, the U.S. authorities set in motion the process of pressing charges against the community of Pelly Bay.

Pelly Bay is a tiny Inuit village located in the heart of Canada's newest territory called Nunavut. The people there call themselves Netsilik (people of the seal) their life-style revolves around their ability to harvest and utilize seals. Pelly Bay is known as one of the most traditional Inuit villages in the Canada Arctic.

This incident begs the question: why are the Inuit of Pelly Bay being harassed and threatened by one of the most powerful nations on earth? The problem can best be explained by considering the ringed seal: Inuit hunters annually take about 50,000 of an estimated 2.5 million ringed seals in the Canadian Arctic. This Act has not stopped the Inuit hunt of marine mammals, but has unfortunately, limited access to important markets which in some cases has compromised the Inuit desire and ability to ensure that the entire animal gets used.

For example, in the case of seals, the entire animal is used for food, and the by-products of the hunt such as skin and bone are used for clothing, and arts and crafts. Today, the MMPA decreases Inuit ability to access all markets and to ensure that all parts of hunted animals serve some purpose.

The aim of the MMPA is to protect marine mammal populations. A stated goal of the Act is the maintenance of marine mammal population levels at what is called their "optimum sustainable production". Such a goal implies that a sustainable harvest of marine mammals would be a tool that is consistent with the Act. This, of course, is not the case. In fact, the passage of the MMPA has had two significant effects. The first is the closure of an important market for marine mammal products. The second effect, however, is more insidious. The MMPA, and some of its offshoots have created the impression that marine mammal populations are threatened overall, as well as the perception that products of marine mammals are ethically undesirable to Americans. Saving seals is good: killing them is bad.

  

Back to Top  |  Return to Aquatic Index  | BackNext Page


Go to - Mainpage IWMC World Conservation Trust