At the time of Namibia's independence (in 1990) the National policy
objectives for the fisheries sector were clearly stated in the White Paper
policy document entitled 'Towards Responsible Development of the Fisheries
Sector' (December 1991, p. 42 and 44) as follows:
The Government's main objective for the fisheries sector is to utilize the
country's fisheries resources on a sustainable basis and to develop industries
based on them in a way that ensures their lasting contribution to the country's
economy and overall development objectives. All stocks will otherwise be
exploited on a sustainable basis and at moderate levels, in general below that
estimated to give maximum sustainable yields. Seals are considered to be
exploitable resources and will be utilized through culling, but conserved at
safe sustainable population levels.
Following the 1994/95 mass mortality event the policy regarding seal
utilization appears to have moved away from that stated above. While the
Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources has
reaffirmed that the Namibian Government does not harvest seals in order to
promote fish survival, he stated that "The Ministry has advanced a plan to
cut [the population] to 500000 seals over the next five to seven years - (The
Namibian, 14 July 1994). He suggested that this would be a "manageable
number" (op cit.). He also stated that "management decided to reduce
the population size in view of an obviously over-populated situation"
[African Wildlife vol. 49(3) - 13-15].
At the same time, in an effort to clarify the policy on seals, the Namibian
Government issued a press release through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs which
stated: "As a matter of fact, the seal population has flourished to such an
extent that they represent a very real threat to other marine life with an equal
right to protection and sustainable exploitation. The fishing industry, -the
fourth largest sector of the Namibian economy -would be genuinely threatened by
the uncontrolled proliferation of seals. Therefore, if the seals are allowed to
breed without any degree of control, this would, without a shadow of a doubt,
place the entire industry -not to mention the thousands of jobs it provides as
well as the very survival of the seals themselves -in serious jeopardy.
Despite this real threat, the seals are not being harvested at the behest of
the fishing industry merely to reduce their numbers. The Namibian Government's
approach to the question of seal harvesting is guided by the same principles
which apply to the utilization of any other natural resource failing within its
jurisdiction - namely, that these be utilized on a sustainable basis, to the
benefit of the inhabitants of the country. It was for this reason that a
decision had to be taken to curb and maintain Namibia's seal population at a
sustainable level of 550,000 - down from the totally unsustainable level of
860,000 foraging seals.
The unusually high number of seal deaths - estimated at 250,000 - which
occurred in 1994 due to unexpected variations in oceanic conditions,
demonstrates the fact that Namibia's seat population had increased to the point
where they exceeded by far the carrying capacity of the environment. It must
surely be agreed, therefore, that it is more humane to curb the unrestrained
seal population to a level where they can be sustained by the environment."
(Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Namibia, Press release No 52195 dated 22
September 1995-Namibia's seal harvesting policy.)
In the light of the above statements it seems necessary to clarify long-term
management policy, and to evaluate alternative seal management strategies in
terms of their scientific basis, and their expected implications for the seal
population, the fish stocks, the commercial fisheries and the sealing industry.