The conservation of brown bears (and all other large carnivores) is without
doubt a difficult and expensive business in our modern, crowded world. This is
especially true from a European perspective, as there are no large wilderness
areas to serve as refuges. Instead, bear conservation must be achieved in close
proximity to people and their activities in a landscape that is often highly
fragmented and hostile to bears.
The fact that bears still occur in Europe often comes as a surprise to both
Europeans and non-Europeans alike. Bears have co-inhabited Europe together with
humans (first as hunter-gatherers and then as farmers) since the retreat of the
Pleistocene glaciers 10,000 years ago. This persistence must be seen as both a
tribute to the adaptability of bears to humans and of humans to bears. During
these 10,000 years Europeans have always had an uneasy relationship with bears,
a mixture of awe, respect, fear and hatred. As long as technology was primitive
and human population pressure not too great there was room on the continent for
both species. In the last few centuries rapid human population growth, habitat
loss and fragmentation, the development of effective poisons and guns, and
changes in livestock husbandry led to greater competition and conflicts that
almost resulted in the eradication of bears from western Europe. Public opinion
and legislation in favour of bear conservation only began to change in the 1970’s
and 1980’s. This change in status coincides with reforestation and increases
in wild ungulate populations, and probably came just in time for many of the
relict populations in western Europe. In eastern Europe, populations had
persisted at somewhat higher levels due to the slower loss of habitat and the
value that was placed on bears as hunting trophies.
At present there is a widespread public understanding that existing bear
populations should be conserved, and that some former populations should be
restored. However, Europe is also very protective of its agriculture and spends
vast amounts of money on subsidizing rural areas. In addition, infrastructure
development is increasing. Therefore, bear conservation is confronted with many
potential conflicts. If the considerable difficulties involved in balancing bear
conservation with agriculture and other land uses are to be overcome there is a
need to base conservation and management on a solid background of scientific
information. Because of limited funding available for research it is vital to
ensure the effective communication of results between research groups, interest
groups and between countries and continents.
Increased cross-border communication is the objective of this European brown
bear compendium. Inspired by the North American "Grizzly Bear
Compendium" published in 1987 we have aimed to compile an overview of the
European experience into one document. By summarizing relevant information on
distribution, status, management regime, and research and conservation projects
in tables we hope to provide an efficient overview of the European situation.
The bibliography contains an "as-complete-as-possible" listing of the
considerable body of research on Europe’s brown bears. We hope that it will
serve as a resource for conservationists, managers and researchers from both
Europe and further afield.
Providing a critical review of the published material is beyond the scope of
this compendium, although the following sections attempt to provide a brief
overview to set the scene. Several recent summaries are available in the form of
action plans prepared by the Council of Europe, WWF and IUCN (Kemf et al.,
1999; Servheen et al., 1999; Swenson et al., 1999). As wildlife
research in Europe has undergone an explosion in recent years and new material
is constantly being produced, we aim to constantly update the bibliography.