The Halibut Convention was first signed in 1923, modifications occurred
over time, but the changes were largely technical. This treaty is bilateral
between Canada and the United States and was negotiated to provide for the
restoration of the stocks of halibut. A scientific staff was formed to
assess halibut populations and recommend harvest rates so that halibut
could recover to a level that provides the maximum sustained yield. The
Convention provides for the establishment of fishing divisions, size
limits, open and closed seasons, allowable gear, etc, all designed to
permit a rational fishery. After the catches are divided between the two
countries, each establishes its own allocations between its user groups.
There is broad agreement that the Convention is a success. Stocks are
healthy, they are above the level that produces MSY and they are three
times larger than they were thirty years ago.
The success of this Convention has generated sufficient confidence to
allow both countries to implement Individual Transferable Quota(ITQ’s)
systems that materially improve everything from safety at sea to the
delivery of quality fish to the consumer.
While there have been technical changes to the Convention , little
manipulation of the agreement- or its interpretation of original intent has
occurred. The halibut has been managed as a single species fishery and
until recently as a single gear type activity. The growth of recreational
fishing for halibut along with an incidental take, particularly in trawl
fisheries, is accounted for in the catch data used to calculate annual
quotas. The Convention has low political visibility outside of the fishing
world and faces virtually no pressure for change.