recent article in the Seattle Times, United States, on the life of the Chukchi
and Yup’ik Eskimos of Chukotka demonstrated very clearly the extent to which
International Whaling Commission policies have hurt Indigenous Peoples around
the world.
The Chukotkan people have been vilified by non-use organisations such as
Greenpeace and the International Fund for Animal Welfare over the years for
their continued take of the gray whale.
The Makah people on the Olympic Peninsula in Washington State have also
unjustly been hounded by save-the-whalers. The Canadian Inuit are another case
in point. All of these cultures and more should be supported and congratulated
for being able to keep alive their traditions in the face of misguided and wrong
opposition.
For the Chukotkan people, the reality is all too stark. These native people
of Russia’s far north have been pushed back to subsistence on a scale rarely,
if ever, seen in modern times, the Seattle Times states. The more than 120 gray
whales killed each year in hunts are not for keeping culture alive, such as the
Makah, but to keep families alive.
These people are the Chukchi and the Yup'ik Eskimos. The Chukchi who today
whale were once traditional reindeer herders, who have had to turn to the sea
for sustenance. Even less than 12 months ago, August 2000, the shelves in the
remote village stores were bare. Some families had nothing to feed their
children but gray whale.
This is the same gray whale that appear to have depleted its food supplies in
the areas in which they live. The estimated 26,000-strong population, which
roams from near Mexico, along the West Coasts of the United States and Canada to
the shallow waters of the Bering Strait to feed on shrimp, crab, kelp and
seaweed, had exceeded the area in which their population lives.
This has been determined from a number of experiments, including the
measurements of blubber thickness of whales washed up on the beach along the
West Coast of the North Americas. The blubber thickness was sizeably smaller
suggesting the whales were not getting enough food. The direct result of giving
one part of a fisheries management area – in this case the whales – total
protection over all other areas of the same fishery. The imbalance results in
the growth of one part of the fishery over all others.
The point is this. With the 120 gray taken from the Russian Far North, five
taken each year by the Makah, the gray whale population could handle a take of
more.
Anthropologists firmly believe that customary diet is even more important in
establishing and maintaining an individual’s cultural identity than any other
distinctive attribute, including even language.
The harvesting of whales for food is a cultural tradition. Unfortunately for
the coastal villagers of Chukotka, it is very much for survival. But the reasons
to keep whaling for food are mostly cultural, not economic, and to say otherwise
is to deny the Chukotkan people, the Makah and many other cultures their right
to a full future. 