|
Sustainable
eNews |
18 June 2003 |
|
IWC 55 -
Berlin, Germany |
|

|
IWMC
World Conservation Trust |
|
Australian
Scientist Disputes The Wisdom of "Whale-Saving" Activism
|
Dr. Tim Flannery is an Australian mammalogist,
author, and director of the South Australian Museum. He believes that
management of cetaceans should be carried out with common sense and a
command of the biological facts, rather than through the propagation of
what he refers to as "environmental lies" about the many species
that make up those animals known to the lay public as whales. His opinions
and a review of his work are outlined in the Sydney Morning Herald, March
29, 2003, by writer James Woodford; "Eat whale…and save the
planet".
Dr.Flannery uses one of
the green "whale savers'" own arguments, that of alleged whale
high intelligence, to dispute the green case for a total ban on whale
hunting and whale use. Flannery asserts that toothed cetaceans such as
Orcas and dolphins, those hunters of fin fish, squid and certain small
marine mammals, are comparatively intelligent creatures, while he
characterizes the large baleen filter feeders as "tiny brained"
examples of cetacea. Flannery compares the toothed whales to wolves or
dogs, quite intelligent beings, and the filter feeders to sheep, which are
not considered by anyone to be mental giants. His point is that there is
great diversity among "whales", and if Australians eat sheep,
they should not object to sustainable harvest of certain baleen whales.
Dr. Flannery has observed
those arguments for total whale protection that are based on green cultural
myths, and he believes "environmental logic" might better be
applied in making decisions about whale use. He has decided that it is not
ethically questionable to harvest those whales that are no more sentient
than are sheep. We think this argument is appropriate as far as it goes,
and we applaud his stance. His paper, "Beautiful Lies" was
published in Australia's Quarterly Essay, in April 2003.
Interestingly, the green
lobby considers the Flannery argument potentially threatening, because a
Humane Society International spokesperson has quipped that it has
"friends" only in Japan, Norway and Iceland. We believe HSI is
wrong about this, because more and more people around the world are
questioning the classic green myths about "The Whales" and are
beginning to advocate the scientifically based, sustainable use of this
class of animals. Although we believe that principles of sustainability
should be applied in cetacean management decision making, rather than
subjective comparisons of whale intelligence, Dr. Flannery's argument has
considerable merit and should be considered worthwhile as one valid
cultural perspective.
|