Since the establishment of the moratorium on whaling, the IWC has
systematically undermined its own authority in new and novel ways. In
Berlin, a majority of IWC member countries are apparently ready to take
another step towards the oblivion that increasingly appears to be the
Commission’s fate.
The list of black marks on the IWC’s record is already lengthy. The
1986 moratorium was introduced because of political pressure rather than
scientific evidence and the vote itself was only secured when new member
states were bankrolled by an outside body. The IWC then missed its 1990
deadline for reassessing whale stocks and setting new catch quotas, and
continues to miss it to this day. Because a moratorium is, by definition, a
temporary measure, it is incumbent on the IWC to establish a date when it
will be lifted. So far the IWC has failed to do so while ignoring,
side-stepping and obfuscating over any evidence that hunting whales could
be managed in a sustainable manner.
Regional whale sanctuaries were established, again under political
pressure and without any technical justification. The IWC has never
properly evaluated their impact, but it is difficult to imagine what they
have really achieved so far.
The Revised Management Procedure (RMP) was only agreed after lengthy
delay and following the resignation of the chairman of the Scientific
Committee. The Revised Management Scheme (RMS), the completion of which is
the IWC’s core responsibility, is still under discussion after ten years
of fruitless debate orchestrated by outside bodies.