News & updates

Opening Statement by IWMC World Conservation Trust to IWC 65

Share on twitter
Share this

IWMC World Conservation Trust wishes to thank the Government of the Republic of Slovenia and its people for hosting the 65th Meeting of the International Whaling Commission

Whatever else might be said about the debate over whaling, it has demonstrated considerable longevity as an ongoing public issue.  This might be understandable in the context of past over-exploitation of whale stocks but it is all the more remarkable considering the minimal whaling that has occurred in recent times.  The whale was saved in the last century and most stocks are doing fine.  

Today’s limited demand for whale products has done nothing to deter the appetite of the doom-sayers.  The usual solemn literature and grave countenances will be on display at IWC 65 in Slovenia, calculated once again to appeal to the minds, pocketbooks and votes of those with a thirst for the sentimental and who place their trust in the dubious validity of animal rights propaganda. 

In reality, the debate about whaling is a subset of the broader debate about global food production and how – or whether – to feed the poor.  Of course, greater consumption of whale meat will not solve the problem of the world’s starving and malnourished but it does symbolize and represent the principles that are being contended.  To those opposed to the use of animals, one of the most retrograde steps that could be taken is to allow whales to be more widely consumed.  To those who aim to alleviate hunger and poverty, it makes no sense to prevent the consumption of an abundant source of protein. 

So the headlines in Slovenia may belong to those displaying the longest faces, the greatest outrage and the most sensational rhetoric, but the real test will lie elsewhere.  The most important business at IWC 65 will come with the discussion of the African resolution on Food Security.  

Given the traditional discord that these meetings generate, such a resolution is a sign of progress.  It brings the focus back to where it should reside.  And it is encouraging that nations that typically have not sought the spotlight are prepared to show the IWC a new and pragmatic direction. 

842 million people suffer from chronic hunger and it is likely that they would find the disagreements about whaling in Portoroz to be nonsensical and surreal – if they were ever asked for their opinion.  The Food Security resolution provides a sober reminder of the continuing crisis of global hunger.  If the IWC cannot agree on management procedures, can it at least agree that people should be fed?  If the IWC cannot find a way to regulate small whale catches, can it at least identify where the moral imperative lies? 

It is time for the IWC to find a better way forward.  Perhaps IWC 65 will open the way for greater consensus.  If so, the Resolution on Food Security represents a hopeful start. 

Related content

IWC Reform is Long Overdue

We have a major challenge ahead of us here in Brazil. Does the IWC possess the courage and capability to reform itself? Or will it

IWMC Feature

Conservation Influencers

Conservation Influencers is a searchable directory of the animal activist, environmental and ecological lobby. It examines the history, mission, methodology and reputation of NGOs to assess their impact on the global conservation cause.

Wildlife Conservation Society

In 1906, the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) put an African man on display in Bronx Zoo’s Monkey House. In 1918, one of WCS’s founding fathers, Madison Grant, published Passing of the Great Race, which Adolf Hitler referred to as his ‘Bible’. Another leading creator and early leader of WCS, Henry Fairfield Osborn Sr, was also a founder of the American Eugenics Society. His son headed WCS from 1940 to 1968, overseeing a series of major initiatives in Africa. There, WCS became one of the architects of the prohibition movement, which put wildlife for consumptive use and vast regions of land out of bounds to humanity. In 2020, WCS distanced itself in public from the racist views of Grant and Henry Fairfield Osborn Sr. But it has yet to issue a critical account of the legacy of Fairfield Osborn Jr, even though he led WCS into the modern era while sharing similar politically-inspired ecological goals to his father and Grant. WCS devotes considerable financial resources to influencing outcomes at CITES. WCS’s CEO reportedly earns USD$1,320,978.