News & updates

CITES and Commercial Fisheries Relationship between CITES and FAO and RMFOs

By J. Berney, IWMC World Conservation Trust.


This paper has not been prepared as a contribution to the review of the CITES criteria for amendment of Appendices I and II. It is published relative to the broad discussion surrounding the potential listing of commercially-exploited marine resources and the related potential conflict between CITES and the fisheries community, in which the review of the criteria is playing a significant role. Nor was it prepared to indicate that everything is fine in fisheries and that, therefore, there is no need to list marine species in CITES appendices.Its purpose is to explain how CITES works and how it would or could affect the fisheries community if such resources would be included in CITES appendices without the agree mentor support of the latter. It is primarily directed to the representatives of the fisheries community, whose knowledge ofCITES is, in general, insufficient.It is hoped that this paper would help them to act efficiently at all levels to achieve their own objectives and to prevent them measures they do not consider appropriate, if not counterproductive, from being imposed upon them.

View PDF in English.

View PDF in French.

View PDF in Spanish.

Related content

Fisheries are choking on good(?) intentions

Author Nils Stolpe/FishNet USA Choking On Good Intentions In multispecies fisheries, regulators must distinguish between stocks that are truly threatened or endangered and those that

IWMC Feature

Conservation Influencers

Conservation Influencers is a searchable directory of the animal activist, environmental and ecological lobby. It examines the history, mission, methodology and reputation of NGOs to assess their impact on the global conservation cause.

Franz Weber Foundation

From 1990 until 2015, Franz Weber Foundation (FFW) managed the Fazao-Malfakassa National Park in Togo, which was, according to an in-depth investigation by Duke University, ‘established by forcing the local communities off their land and without taking into consideration their point of view’. That same study cited convincing evidence from reports published in 1990, confirming that competition for land use was already ‘creating conflict between the local communities and park managers’. In 2015 Togo refused to renew FFW’s contract because, the report says, ‘local communities were still excluded from the management of the natural resources of their land’ and FFW had ‘failed to fulfil its contract’. Franz Weber Foundation plays a major role within CITES because it funds and manages from Switzerland the African Elephant Coalition (AEC), which represents 32 African range states, some of which have barely any elephants and others none at all. Contrary to the wishes of the range states in Southern Africa, which manage most of the world’s wild elephant populations, the AEC at CITES’ CoPs repeatedly tables proposals to put all of the world’s elephants in appendix I. And the AEC uses its voting power to keep in place prohibitions on ivory sales and all other trade in elephant-related derivatives, including skins and hair, which Southern African nations wish to legalise.