News & updates

Reflections on the UN’s World Oceans Day

Today (June 8, 2021) is United Nations World Oceans Day. This year’s official theme ‘The Ocean: Life and Livelihoods’ is most welcome. IWMC campaigns everyday of every year in defense of the livelihoods that depend upon making responsible commercial use of the oceans. But it strikes IWMC that this year’s worthy theme contradicts last year’s ‘Innovation for a sustainable ocean‘. That theme abused the word innovation by focusing instead on stopping existing and proposed activities on ‘30% of our lands and oceans by 2030 (‘30×30’)’.

In other words, last year the UN used World Oceans Day to campaign to put off limits vast regions of the world’s oceans to ‘save the oceans and combat global warming’. Exactly how marine exclusion zones contribute to preventing global warming is never explained. Perhaps because there’s no science to back the claim, as Ray Hilborn argues in MPAs aren’t the answer to ocean biodiversity, sustainability efforts.

But for sure, if 30 percent of the 70 percent of the world’s surface that’s oceanic were placed out of bounds to commerce and innovation, the impact would be catastrophic. The big losers would be livelihoods dependent on fishers, tourism, commercial shipping, pharmaceuticals, deep-sea mining, oil and gas. But this year, the UN wants us to believe that they do indeed care about people’s livelihoods. So please forgive IWMC for, reluctantly, casting doubt on the efficacy of this year’s World Oceans Days’ theme.

Related content

Fisheries overview


A NATURALHISTORY From the very beginnings of mankind, the world’s oceans and water ways have provided essential sustenance that has supported the development of life.

IWMC Feature

Conservation Influencers

Conservation Influencers is a searchable directory of the animal activist, environmental and ecological lobby. It examines the history, mission, methodology and reputation of NGOs to assess their impact on the global conservation cause.

Franz Weber Foundation

From 1990 until 2015, Franz Weber Foundation (FFW) managed the Fazao-Malfakassa National Park in Togo, which was, according to an in-depth investigation by Duke University, ‘established by forcing the local communities off their land and without taking into consideration their point of view’. That same study cited convincing evidence from reports published in 1990, confirming that competition for land use was already ‘creating conflict between the local communities and park managers’. In 2015 Togo refused to renew FFW’s contract because, the report says, ‘local communities were still excluded from the management of the natural resources of their land’ and FFW had ‘failed to fulfil its contract’. Franz Weber Foundation plays a major role within CITES because it funds and manages from Switzerland the African Elephant Coalition (AEC), which represents 32 African range states, some of which have barely any elephants and others none at all. Contrary to the wishes of the range states in Southern Africa, which manage most of the world’s wild elephant populations, the AEC at CITES’ CoPs repeatedly tables proposals to put all of the world’s elephants in appendix I. And the AEC uses its voting power to keep in place prohibitions on ivory sales and all other trade in elephant-related derivatives, including skins and hair, which Southern African nations wish to legalise.